As digital workflows become the norm across corporate America, electronic signatures have moved from a convenience to a necessity. From onboarding paperwork to vendor contracts and internal approvals, e-signatures streamline operations, reduce administrative overhead, and accelerate decision-making. Yet many companies still rely on ad-hoc processes or outdated assumptions about legal validity. For employers looking to modernize while staying compliant, establishing a clear and...

A compliance-related employee handbook policy that is often overlooked is the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) policy statement. Though arguably not a required policy statement, it is a policy comparable to other policies on non-discrimination that should be in employee handbooks. These nondiscrimination policies tell employees, managers, and the world that the employer prohibits these forms of discrimination.

Last week, part I of this article laid out what a limitation of action agreement is and how it can be used by employers. This week we look at what the recent Michigan Supreme Court’s decision in Rayford v American House of Roseville I LLC handed down on July 31st said.

One of the more esoteric areas of employment law is the use of limitation of action clauses in handbooks and other employment documents. A limitation of action agreement, as the name suggests, limits the amount the time in which an employee may bring some sort of wrongful employment claim against the employer – a sometimes handy tool.

When reviewing employee handbooks one of the tougher feedback discussions is about how a policy is written and having to explain why on its face it is a fairly esoteric policy, but it is too broadly written and may be a violation of federal labor law.

With the passage of the PUMP Act last year employers with 50 or more employees should now consider including a policy addressing nursing mothers in the workplace. Employers under 50 in size may have an exemption but only if they can demonstrate that compliance for a particular employee causes undue hardship.

Employers that have multistate locations or just employees located in another state (including remote workers) need to monitor those state and local employment related laws and regulations to ensure their employee handbooks stay up to date and in compliance.